No Result
View All Result
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Smart Investment Today
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Smart Investment Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Editor's Pick

Replacement Tire Standards

by
August 21, 2026
in Editor's Pick
0
Replacement Tire Standards
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Peter Van Doren


(Getty Images)

I have written extensively over the years about the lack of evidence of consumer myopia in the context of automobile fuel economy mileage standards. The standards were premised on the belief that consumers would not pay more for cars that used less fuel, even if the savings from reduced fuel use exceeded the extra initial cost of the more efficient vehicle. Instead, mileage standards sought to force automakers to produce higher-mileage cars and thereby reduce fuel use despite the supposed myopia of consumers. Subsequent economic research has shown that consumers were not myopic. Consumers’ willingness to pay for higher mileage capability is approximately equal to the expected future fuel-cost savings without government intervention.

Recently, the California Energy Commission enacted an analogous regulation regarding replacement tires. Replacement tires sold in the state must have the same rolling resistance on average as the tires sold with new vehicles by 2033. Currently, only about 30 percent of tires meet the 2033 standards. According to the commission, the tires would cost about $26 extra but would be offset by fuel savings of $179 over the life of the tire, resulting in a net savings of $153.

Now you are expecting that I will say that markets work and consumers don’t need help, but I must admit that in all my years of buying tires, I have had discussions about tread-wear lifetimes and price differences, but rolling resistance has never been discussed. 

Historically, there were large trade-offs between road grip, treadwear mileage, and rolling resistance. Recent innovations have reduced the trade-offs between grip, wear, and rolling resistance, but even Consumer Reports considers many factors in tire ratings other than rolling resistance.

So maybe California has a point. But there are trade-offs. And new tires are designed to meet mileage standards, which I have clearly shown we do not need. So if such standards did not exist, what characteristics would tires on new cars have? We should find out, not simply mandate that replacement tires mimic what regulation has produced.

Previous Post

Ream v. US Department of the Treasury Brief: Restore the Original Meaning of the Commerce Clause

    Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest insights, updates, and exclusive content straight to your inbox! Whether it's industry news, expert advice, or inspiring stories, we bring you valuable information that you won't find anywhere else. Stay connected with us!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    • Trending
    • Comments
    • Latest
    Pibit.AI raises $7m Series A to bring trusted AI underwriting to the insurance sector

    Pibit.AI raises $7m Series A to bring trusted AI underwriting to the insurance sector

    November 20, 2025

    Gold Prices Rise as the Dollar Slowly Dies

    May 25, 2024

    Richard Murphy, The Bank of England, And MMT Confusion

    March 15, 2025

    We Can’t Fix International Organizations like the WTO. Abolish Them.

    March 15, 2025

    Ana-Maria Coaching Marks Milestone with New Book Release

    0

    New Bonded Warehouse Facilities Launched in Immingham

    0
    Replacement Tire Standards

    Replacement Tire Standards

    0

    From Corporate Burnout to High-Performance Coach: Anna Mosley’s Inspiring Journey with ‘Eighty’

    0
    Replacement Tire Standards

    Replacement Tire Standards

    August 21, 2026
    Ream v. US Department of the Treasury Brief: Restore the Original Meaning of the Commerce Clause

    Ream v. US Department of the Treasury Brief: Restore the Original Meaning of the Commerce Clause

    August 21, 2026
    Hundreds of pharmacies weigh closure as business rates bills soar

    Hundreds of pharmacies weigh closure as business rates bills soar

    August 21, 2026
    UK firms in critical financial distress rise 9% to more than 53,000

    UK firms in critical financial distress rise 9% to more than 53,000

    August 21, 2026

    Recent News

    Replacement Tire Standards

    Replacement Tire Standards

    August 21, 2026
    Ream v. US Department of the Treasury Brief: Restore the Original Meaning of the Commerce Clause

    Ream v. US Department of the Treasury Brief: Restore the Original Meaning of the Commerce Clause

    August 21, 2026
    Hundreds of pharmacies weigh closure as business rates bills soar

    Hundreds of pharmacies weigh closure as business rates bills soar

    August 21, 2026
    UK firms in critical financial distress rise 9% to more than 53,000

    UK firms in critical financial distress rise 9% to more than 53,000

    August 21, 2026
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2026 smartinvestmenttoday.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • News
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Investing
    • Stock

    Copyright © 2026 smartinvestmenttoday.com | All Rights Reserved