No Result
View All Result
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Smart Investment Today
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Smart Investment Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Editor's Pick

Sealed Case Brief: Courts Must Protect the Right to Criticize ICE Anonymously Online

by
October 29, 2026
in Editor's Pick
0
Sealed Case Brief: Courts Must Protect the Right to Criticize ICE Anonymously Online
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Matthew Cavedon

A few months ago, Reddit received an administrative subpoena requesting identifying information for an account that had criticized Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) as well as posted biographical details about Jonathan Ross, the ICE officer who fatally shot protester Renée Good. After the user moved to quash, the administrative subpoena was withdrawn. But days after, Reddit received a grand jury subpoena for similar information. The user’s motion to quash the grand jury subpoena was denied, and the user is appealing the denial to the DC Circuit.

Cato joined an amicus brief filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), ACLU of DC, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Center for Individual Rights urging the court to rigorously review the basis for the grand jury subpoena. The right to anonymity is deeply rooted in American history and serves critical functions online and off. While the grand jury traditionally has broad investigative authority, judicial scrutiny is warranted where a grand jury seeks to unmask an anonymous speaker. The government’s interest in unmasking will not be sufficiently compelling to justify piercing a speaker’s anonymity unless the government has made a prima facie showing that the speaker committed a crime. Nor is unmasking an anonymous speaker to chill protected speech a proper purpose for a grand jury subpoena.

Given that this case is sealed, amici cannot speak to the information sought here or the government’s interest in it. However, several of the amici have represented several anonymous internet users whose information was subpoenaed without any legitimate—let alone compelling—need. They have moved to quash several administrative subpoenas that were issued not for any lawful investigative purpose but to chill or silence criticism of the federal government online. Based on this experience and public reporting, amici are concerned that having failed to unmask anonymous critics using administrative subpoenas, the Trump administration is now turning to grand jury subpoenas to accomplish the same ends.

Previous Post

Legitimate Care or a Tax-Fed Racket? Mental Health Care for Adolescent Girls

Next Post

David Lloyd paid £330m dividend as 267,450 members left in 2025

Next Post
David Lloyd paid £330m dividend as 267,450 members left in 2025

David Lloyd paid £330m dividend as 267,450 members left in 2025

    Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest insights, updates, and exclusive content straight to your inbox! Whether it's industry news, expert advice, or inspiring stories, we bring you valuable information that you won't find anywhere else. Stay connected with us!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    • Trending
    • Comments
    • Latest
    Pibit.AI raises $7m Series A to bring trusted AI underwriting to the insurance sector

    Pibit.AI raises $7m Series A to bring trusted AI underwriting to the insurance sector

    November 20, 2025

    Gold Prices Rise as the Dollar Slowly Dies

    May 25, 2024

    Richard Murphy, The Bank of England, And MMT Confusion

    March 15, 2025

    We Can’t Fix International Organizations like the WTO. Abolish Them.

    March 15, 2025

    Ana-Maria Coaching Marks Milestone with New Book Release

    0

    New Bonded Warehouse Facilities Launched in Immingham

    0

    From Corporate Burnout to High-Performance Coach: Anna Mosley’s Inspiring Journey with ‘Eighty’

    0

    Simple Registration Increases Credit Application Success by 27.7%, Reports BadCredit.co.uk

    0
    David Lloyd paid £330m dividend as 267,450 members left in 2025

    David Lloyd paid £330m dividend as 267,450 members left in 2025

    October 29, 2026
    Sealed Case Brief: Courts Must Protect the Right to Criticize ICE Anonymously Online

    Sealed Case Brief: Courts Must Protect the Right to Criticize ICE Anonymously Online

    October 29, 2026

    Legitimate Care or a Tax-Fed Racket? Mental Health Care for Adolescent Girls

    October 29, 2026
    Lloyds calls bank tax rise ‘unhelpful’ as Q3 profit nearly doubles

    Lloyds calls bank tax rise ‘unhelpful’ as Q3 profit nearly doubles

    October 29, 2026

    Recent News

    David Lloyd paid £330m dividend as 267,450 members left in 2025

    David Lloyd paid £330m dividend as 267,450 members left in 2025

    October 29, 2026
    Sealed Case Brief: Courts Must Protect the Right to Criticize ICE Anonymously Online

    Sealed Case Brief: Courts Must Protect the Right to Criticize ICE Anonymously Online

    October 29, 2026

    Legitimate Care or a Tax-Fed Racket? Mental Health Care for Adolescent Girls

    October 29, 2026
    Lloyds calls bank tax rise ‘unhelpful’ as Q3 profit nearly doubles

    Lloyds calls bank tax rise ‘unhelpful’ as Q3 profit nearly doubles

    October 29, 2026
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2026 smartinvestmenttoday.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • News
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Investing
    • Stock

    Copyright © 2026 smartinvestmenttoday.com | All Rights Reserved