No Result
View All Result
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Smart Investment Today
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Smart Investment Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Editor's Pick

USPS Issues Proposed Mail Voting Rules Pursuant to Trump Executive Order

by
May 29, 2026
in Editor's Pick
0
USPS Issues Proposed Mail Voting Rules Pursuant to Trump Executive Order
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Stephen Richer

On Friday morning (May 29), the United States Postal Service issued proposed mail voting rules in furtherance of President Trump’s second executive order on election administration (“Ensuring Citizenship Verification And Integrity In Federal Elections.”). That March 31, 2026, executive order faces multiple legal challenges, one of which it survived earlier this week because the judge ruled that the challenge was insufficiently ripe.

The proposed USPS rule envisions greatly expanded USPS involvement in mail voting. Previously, local election jurisdictions determined the eligibility of voters, kept lists of mail voters, designed the mail ballot packets, and simply used USPS as a reliable vendor for delivery and return. Under the proposed rules, however, the USPS will play a significant role in assessing validity of the mail ballot, finalizing the lists of mail voters, tracking each mail ballot, and designing the ballot envelope. Much of what the rule contemplates is already done by the vast majority of states and local jurisdictions. It just now adds a second layer of responsibilities for those actions. 

The proposed rule also asks USPS to step into some dicey territory. DMM 705.24.5 contemplates the USPS rejecting allegedly invalid returned mail ballots. Currently, the validity of each mail ballot packet is determined by state law implemented by the local jurisdiction. The proposed rule is concerningly vague on this front. What must USPS do if it rejects a mail ballot? Does it have to contact the voter? Does it have to contact the relevant election office? How quickly?

But the biggest question is, can USPS really shoulder this burden? The proposed rule does not apply to primaries (which is kind of weird) or UOCAVA voters (military and overseas). Even so, the general election is only five months away. And some states (e.g., Delaware and North Carolina) send out mail ballots 60 days ahead of Election Day. The proposed rule has a 30-day comment period, so it’s not even “go time” yet. That means USPS will have two months or less from when the rule goes into effect to when it needs to oversee its first mail ballots. 

That’s a lot. Count me as a skeptic. I don’t think the vote by mail infrastructure that states have cobbled together over many years can be reproduced in large part by the USPS in a matter of months.

Of course, all of this is moot if Trump’s executive order is eventually enjoined in relevant part.

Stay tuned. Never a dull moment in American election administration!

Previous Post

Why “Pro-Worker” Policies Don’t Work

Next Post

Horner joins Oakley Capital to steer premium sports dealmaking

Next Post
Horner joins Oakley Capital to steer premium sports dealmaking

Horner joins Oakley Capital to steer premium sports dealmaking

    Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest insights, updates, and exclusive content straight to your inbox! Whether it's industry news, expert advice, or inspiring stories, we bring you valuable information that you won't find anywhere else. Stay connected with us!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    • Trending
    • Comments
    • Latest
    Pibit.AI raises $7m Series A to bring trusted AI underwriting to the insurance sector

    Pibit.AI raises $7m Series A to bring trusted AI underwriting to the insurance sector

    November 20, 2025

    Gold Prices Rise as the Dollar Slowly Dies

    May 25, 2024

    Richard Murphy, The Bank of England, And MMT Confusion

    March 15, 2025

    We Can’t Fix International Organizations like the WTO. Abolish Them.

    March 15, 2025

    Introduction to Marxism Unmasked

    0

    Ana-Maria Coaching Marks Milestone with New Book Release

    0

    New Bonded Warehouse Facilities Launched in Immingham

    0

    From Corporate Burnout to High-Performance Coach: Anna Mosley’s Inspiring Journey with ‘Eighty’

    0
    Heathrow travel confidence hit as Middle East conflict and rising air fares reshape passenger demand

    Heathrow travel confidence hit as Middle East conflict and rising air fares reshape passenger demand

    July 8, 2026
    Does AI Dream of Public Interest Regulation?

    Does AI Dream of Public Interest Regulation?

    July 8, 2026
    Does AI Dream of Public Interest Regulation?

    Does AI Dream of Public Interest Regulation?

    July 8, 2026

    Does Rent Control Redistribute from Poorer to Richer?

    July 8, 2026

    Recent News

    Heathrow travel confidence hit as Middle East conflict and rising air fares reshape passenger demand

    Heathrow travel confidence hit as Middle East conflict and rising air fares reshape passenger demand

    July 8, 2026
    Does AI Dream of Public Interest Regulation?

    Does AI Dream of Public Interest Regulation?

    July 8, 2026
    Does AI Dream of Public Interest Regulation?

    Does AI Dream of Public Interest Regulation?

    July 8, 2026

    Does Rent Control Redistribute from Poorer to Richer?

    July 8, 2026
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2026 smartinvestmenttoday.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • News
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Investing
    • Stock

    Copyright © 2026 smartinvestmenttoday.com | All Rights Reserved