No Result
View All Result
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Smart Investment Today
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Smart Investment Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Editor's Pick

Legal Brief: Even in Emergencies, the President Cannot Seize Congress’s Tariff Powers

by
July 9, 2025
in Editor's Pick
0
Legal Brief: Even in Emergencies, the President Cannot Seize Congress’s Tariff Powers
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Thomas A. Berry, Brent Skorup, and Charles Brandt

Shortly after taking office, President Trump issued a series of executive orders imposing new duties on imports from dozens of countries, resulting in rapid increases and (partial) decreases in tariff rates, from 10 to 145 percent. The president claims the tariffs are necessary to combat illegal drug trafficking and trade imbalances, both of which he has declared “national emergencies.” Therefore, he relied on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA) to impose tariffs on nearly every US trading partner.

The IEEPA gives the president broad powers to block transactions between Americans and foreign citizens when responding to an “unusual and extraordinary threat.” And for decades, presidents have used this law to impose economic sanctions on nations or individuals. But this is the first time a president has imposed tariffs under the IEEPA.

The new tariffs have imposed large costs on many owners of American businesses. A group of states and small businesses, including VOS Selections, Inc.—a family-owned wine and spirits company—sued the president in the US Court of International Trade (CIT), to block the tariffs. They argued that setting duties exceeded the president’s legal authority under IEEPA and violated the Constitution.

The CIT agreed with VOS Selections and permanently enjoined the tariffs. Now, the administration has appealed to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. Cato has filed an amicus brief in support of VOS Selections.

In our brief, we provide historical context about Congress’s constitutional role in tariff policy and the IEEPA’s original purpose. Under recent Supreme Court precedent, Loper Bright v. Raimondo (2024), courts must independently determine the best reading of a statute and not automatically defer to the executive’s interpretation. We highlight several problems with the administration’s position.

First, Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution vests the power to impose tariffs solely in Congress. For more than a century, Congress set tariff rates directly, even in times of war and national crisis. The reason for this longstanding practice is clear: Congress cannot vest duty-setting power—a legislative power—with the president, just as Congress cannot vest judicial power with the president or the Speaker of the House.

Second, the IEEPA’s text provides no support for the president’s tariff authority. When Congress has delegated some tariff authority to the president, it has done so clearly and explicitly, as in the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and the Trade Act of 1974. The IEEPA is different. It makes no mention of “tariffs” or “duties,” and no president has used it to impose tariffs in the nearly 50 years since it became law—until now.

Finally, the government’s position runs contrary to IEEPA’s purpose. Congress passed the IEEPA to limit executive power during emergencies. Even President Franklin Roosevelt—who had an expansive theory of presidential power and was president during an economic depression and a global war—never used IEEPA’s more powerful predecessor, the Trading with the Enemy Act, to modify tariffs.

It is thus ironic—and legally untenable—for a president to invoke IEEPA for tariff-setting authority that no president has ever exercised. The Court should reject the government’s position, affirm the CIT’s decision, and block the imposition of these tariffs.

Previous Post

Ovacome, UK’s Leading Ovarian Cancer Support Charity, Plans Visit to Wales

Next Post

Why Black Banx Is the Preferred Banking Partner for Global Startups

Next Post

Why Black Banx Is the Preferred Banking Partner for Global Startups

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    • Trending
    • Comments
    • Latest

    Gold Prices Rise as the Dollar Slowly Dies

    May 25, 2024

    Richard Murphy, The Bank of England, And MMT Confusion

    March 15, 2025

    We Can’t Fix International Organizations like the WTO. Abolish Them.

    March 15, 2025

    Free Markets Promote Peaceful Cooperation and Racial Harmony

    March 15, 2025

    Wildlife Trust New Arrival: Adorable Baby Beaver Born at Heal Somerset Wildlife Trust

    0

    Ana-Maria Coaching Marks Milestone with New Book Release

    0

    The Consequences of California’s New Minimum Wage Law

    0

    Memorial Day

    0

    Wildlife Trust New Arrival: Adorable Baby Beaver Born at Heal Somerset Wildlife Trust

    July 10, 2025
    UK government scraps ‘zonal pricing’ for energy in favour of single national rate

    UK government scraps ‘zonal pricing’ for energy in favour of single national rate

    July 10, 2025

    Smarter Testing Tools for Smarter Classrooms

    July 10, 2025
    Businesses face £60,000 fines per illegal worker as HMRC and UKVI escalate crackdown

    Businesses face £60,000 fines per illegal worker as HMRC and UKVI escalate crackdown

    July 10, 2025

    Recent News

    Wildlife Trust New Arrival: Adorable Baby Beaver Born at Heal Somerset Wildlife Trust

    July 10, 2025
    UK government scraps ‘zonal pricing’ for energy in favour of single national rate

    UK government scraps ‘zonal pricing’ for energy in favour of single national rate

    July 10, 2025

    Smarter Testing Tools for Smarter Classrooms

    July 10, 2025
    Businesses face £60,000 fines per illegal worker as HMRC and UKVI escalate crackdown

    Businesses face £60,000 fines per illegal worker as HMRC and UKVI escalate crackdown

    July 10, 2025
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 smartinvestmenttoday.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • News
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Investing
    • Stock

    Copyright © 2025 smartinvestmenttoday.com | All Rights Reserved