No Result
View All Result
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Smart Investment Today
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Smart Investment Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Editor's Pick

Public Schooling, Trump, and the “Book Ban Hoax”

by
January 28, 2025
in Editor's Pick
0
Public Schooling, Trump, and the “Book Ban Hoax”
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Neal McCluskey

On January 24, the US Department of Education announced that it was ending “Biden’s book ban hoax” by dismissing eleven active and six pending complaints with the Office of Civil Rights over public schools removing books from library shelves. Complainants alleged that the removals created a hostile environment for students. The department also eliminated the position of “book ban coordinator” created under the Biden administration. This pulls together two big problems in education: federal overreach and culture war.

The Trump administration is doing the correct federalism thing. The Constitution gives the feds no authority to govern education, leaving it to the people and the states. It does have civil rights enforcement power, but clashes of values—affirming children’s identities versus religious convictions, colorblindness versus ameliorating past wrongs—should not be subject to top-down imposition. Values differences need to be navigated by millions of freely acting people, both to maintain liberty and to reach social equilibria.

Of course, public schooling by its nature—government-established and run schools—does not allow people to freely interact. It requires that all pay for public schools governed by states and school boards that do the will of the political majority, or the minority with the most political power. This is a major reason that book battles are a constant presence. Americans are diverse, and public schools force them to engage in political struggles to decide who gets what they think is right and who does not.

Contentious issues are better handled at lower levels of government—state better than federal, local better than state. Smaller units are more likely to reflect the will of specific communities and they prevent bad decisions from being imposed on many people. But as long as there are any dissenters from what a school district decides, especially about deeply personal issues like gender, race, or religion, public schooling treats them unequally under the law.

The solution is school choice: funding following kids to educational options their families choose. Then all can seek what they think is best without imposing on others. At the federal level, Washington should generally stay out of culture war, which the Trump administration has done with book challenges but seems less inclined to do with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). The latter is potentially at least as big a problem as dictating book policies—we will see how it plays out.

In a world where decent people constantly disagree, imposing one answer on everyone is almost always the wrong policy.

Previous Post

Why School Choice?

Next Post

“SAPHNA CEO Sharon White OBE Announces Retirement”

Next Post

“SAPHNA CEO Sharon White OBE Announces Retirement”

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    • Trending
    • Comments
    • Latest

    Gold Prices Rise as the Dollar Slowly Dies

    May 25, 2024

    Richard Murphy, The Bank of England, And MMT Confusion

    March 15, 2025

    We Can’t Fix International Organizations like the WTO. Abolish Them.

    March 15, 2025

    Free Markets Promote Peaceful Cooperation and Racial Harmony

    March 15, 2025

    The War They Promised Not to Start

    0

    Ana-Maria Coaching Marks Milestone with New Book Release

    0

    The Consequences of California’s New Minimum Wage Law

    0

    Memorial Day

    0

    The War They Promised Not to Start

    June 28, 2025
    A Disappointing Supreme Court Decision Weakens Online First Amendment Protections

    A Disappointing Supreme Court Decision Weakens Online First Amendment Protections

    June 27, 2025
    Brazil’s Supreme Court Rewrites the Rules to Censor Online Speech

    Brazil’s Supreme Court Rewrites the Rules to Censor Online Speech

    June 27, 2025
    The Supreme Court Is Right on Reading Opt-Outs, But That’s Not Enough

    The Supreme Court Is Right on Reading Opt-Outs, But That’s Not Enough

    June 27, 2025

    Recent News

    The War They Promised Not to Start

    June 28, 2025
    A Disappointing Supreme Court Decision Weakens Online First Amendment Protections

    A Disappointing Supreme Court Decision Weakens Online First Amendment Protections

    June 27, 2025
    Brazil’s Supreme Court Rewrites the Rules to Censor Online Speech

    Brazil’s Supreme Court Rewrites the Rules to Censor Online Speech

    June 27, 2025
    The Supreme Court Is Right on Reading Opt-Outs, But That’s Not Enough

    The Supreme Court Is Right on Reading Opt-Outs, But That’s Not Enough

    June 27, 2025
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 smartinvestmenttoday.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • News
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Investing
    • Stock

    Copyright © 2025 smartinvestmenttoday.com | All Rights Reserved