No Result
View All Result
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Smart Investment Today
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Smart Investment Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Editor's Pick

Postal Banking Continues to Fail

by
June 16, 2025
in Editor's Pick
0
Postal Banking Continues to Fail
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Nicholas Anthony

It has been nearly three years since the postal banking pilot program had a customer (Table 1). It’s time for Congress to step in and put this program to rest. 

What is the Postal Banking Pilot Program?

For anyone wondering, “What is the postal banking pilot program?” here’s a brief breakdown to get you up to speed. The United States Postal Service (USPS) offered banking services up until 1966. It was largely discontinued because the service wasn’t popular. More recently, however, people have been calling for a return to postal banking. The argument is that having the government provide bank accounts would help the millions of Americans who do not have accounts.

The USPS needs Congress to sign off on such a radical change, and there’s little sign of that happening. So, the USPS did the next worst thing: it exploited past expansions of its authority to create the postal banking pilot program. Almost overnight, the USPS launched the new program in four cities. People could now bring in their payroll checks and get them loaded onto prepaid gift cards, albeit for a fee of $5.95 and a daily limit of $500.

Doomed from the Start

Over the years, I’ve been skeptical of proposals for postal banking. The idea that the post office could be a solution for financial inclusion doesn’t add up.

Proponents have argued that the widespread nature of post offices will help because banks don’t have physical locations as much as they used to. Yet, the Americans who don’t have bank accounts routinely rate inconvenient hours and locations as their least pressing concerns. Proponents also say that the post office would offer better prices than the private sector because it doesn’t factor in making a profit. Yet, the prices for the postal banking pilot program exceed those of alternatives like Check Cash Depot and Walmart (Figure 1). 

Conclusion

The USPS has said there’s nothing to worry about. It argues that the program costs nothing because there have not been any customers. Congress should not take this argument as a reason for relief. It’s time to put this program to rest.

Congress should remove the postal banking loophole by amending the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act to specifically prohibit the USPS from engaging in new financial services without congressional approval. Otherwise, mission creep at the USPS may become a never-ending story.

Previous Post

Baltimore Corruption

Next Post

Simbi Wabote’s Blueprint: How African Oil Nations Can Build Effective Local Content Frameworks

Next Post
Simbi Wabote’s Blueprint: How African Oil Nations Can Build Effective Local Content Frameworks

Simbi Wabote’s Blueprint: How African Oil Nations Can Build Effective Local Content Frameworks

    Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    • Trending
    • Comments
    • Latest

    Gold Prices Rise as the Dollar Slowly Dies

    May 25, 2024

    Richard Murphy, The Bank of England, And MMT Confusion

    March 15, 2025

    We Can’t Fix International Organizations like the WTO. Abolish Them.

    March 15, 2025

    Free Markets Promote Peaceful Cooperation and Racial Harmony

    March 15, 2025
    Skinner v. Louisiana Brief: Prosecutors Must Be Held Accountable for Withholding Exculpatory Evidence

    Skinner v. Louisiana Brief: Prosecutors Must Be Held Accountable for Withholding Exculpatory Evidence

    0

    Ana-Maria Coaching Marks Milestone with New Book Release

    0

    The Consequences of California’s New Minimum Wage Law

    0

    Memorial Day

    0
    Skinner v. Louisiana Brief: Prosecutors Must Be Held Accountable for Withholding Exculpatory Evidence

    Skinner v. Louisiana Brief: Prosecutors Must Be Held Accountable for Withholding Exculpatory Evidence

    July 31, 2025
    UK property sales rise in June, offering boost to Chancellor Rachel Reeves

    UK property sales rise in June, offering boost to Chancellor Rachel Reeves

    July 31, 2025

    Mother O’ Mercy! Is This the End of the Cal Bullet Train?

    July 31, 2025

    Mother O’ Mercy! Is This the End of the Cal Bullet Train?

    July 31, 2025

    Recent News

    Skinner v. Louisiana Brief: Prosecutors Must Be Held Accountable for Withholding Exculpatory Evidence

    Skinner v. Louisiana Brief: Prosecutors Must Be Held Accountable for Withholding Exculpatory Evidence

    July 31, 2025
    UK property sales rise in June, offering boost to Chancellor Rachel Reeves

    UK property sales rise in June, offering boost to Chancellor Rachel Reeves

    July 31, 2025

    Mother O’ Mercy! Is This the End of the Cal Bullet Train?

    July 31, 2025

    Mother O’ Mercy! Is This the End of the Cal Bullet Train?

    July 31, 2025
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 smartinvestmenttoday.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • News
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Investing
    • Stock

    Copyright © 2025 smartinvestmenttoday.com | All Rights Reserved