No Result
View All Result
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Smart Investment Today
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Smart Investment Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Editor's Pick

Federal Versus State Policies

by
May 22, 2025
in Editor's Pick
0
Federal Versus State Policies
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Jeffrey Miron

What level of government—state or federal—should set economic and social policy?

The modern presumption is that “good” policies should be implemented federally. That is the logic behind the federal role in setting a minimum wage, providing Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security, imposing nationwide environmental regulations, and much more. If something “works,” so the thinking goes, why not apply it everywhere?

Yet there are reasons to prefer state-level control (if any), even if that sometimes produces less-than-ideal outcomes.

For starters, most policies involve a mix of positive and negative effects. And people differ on not only what is “good” but how to balance costs and benefits. A federal mandate forces national uniformity on divisive issues, such as abortion or school curricula. Letting states choose leaves room for calmer disagreement and lower polarization.

Further, government policies and programs tend to grow, especially those at the federal level, but state variation serves as a check. Critics worry about a “race to the bottom,” where states gut regulation to attract business or skimp on redistribution to avoid being a “welfare magnet.” But this tendency, to the extent it occurs, is a useful counterweight to the excessive expansion that is likely to occur when policies are made at the federal level. Plus, in practice, states often go beyond federal standards: Think of California’s aggressive emissions rules or Massachusetts’ expansion of Medicaid before the Affordable Care Act.

To be sure, state-level control has downsides. Some states may do too little—for example, they might underinvest in public health. And state-level variation means national companies face a patchwork of laws and regulations, which raises costs.

But these negatives are plausibly worth accepting to avoid one-size-fits-all federal policies. In particular, federalism likely works best when applied consistently across all policies, whether politically left or right.

This article appeared on Substack on May 22, 2025. Lucy Patalano, a student at Wellesley College, cowrote this post.

Previous Post

Over 38,700 emergency food parcels distributed in Bristol and South Gloucestershire amidst ongoing high demand

Next Post

SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But We Must Address Discrimination Against Religion

Next Post
SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But We Must Address Discrimination Against Religion

SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But We Must Address Discrimination Against Religion

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    • Trending
    • Comments
    • Latest

    Gold Prices Rise as the Dollar Slowly Dies

    May 25, 2024

    Richard Murphy, The Bank of England, And MMT Confusion

    March 15, 2025

    We Can’t Fix International Organizations like the WTO. Abolish Them.

    March 15, 2025

    Free Markets Promote Peaceful Cooperation and Racial Harmony

    March 15, 2025
    Congress Should Repeal the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, Not Expand It

    Congress Should Repeal the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, Not Expand It

    0

    Ana-Maria Coaching Marks Milestone with New Book Release

    0

    The Consequences of California’s New Minimum Wage Law

    0

    Memorial Day

    0
    Congress Should Repeal the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, Not Expand It

    Congress Should Repeal the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, Not Expand It

    May 22, 2025
    Debunking Protectionist Claims About Tariffs and Industrial Expansion

    Debunking Protectionist Claims About Tariffs and Industrial Expansion

    May 22, 2025

    Regime Uncertainty and the Trump New Deal

    May 22, 2025

    “Certified Software from Cognigy Empowers Azure Customers as Microsoft Solutions Partner, Introducing Agentic Enterprise AI Agents”

    May 22, 2025

    Recent News

    Congress Should Repeal the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, Not Expand It

    Congress Should Repeal the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, Not Expand It

    May 22, 2025
    Debunking Protectionist Claims About Tariffs and Industrial Expansion

    Debunking Protectionist Claims About Tariffs and Industrial Expansion

    May 22, 2025

    Regime Uncertainty and the Trump New Deal

    May 22, 2025

    “Certified Software from Cognigy Empowers Azure Customers as Microsoft Solutions Partner, Introducing Agentic Enterprise AI Agents”

    May 22, 2025
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 smartinvestmenttoday.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • News
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Investing
    • Stock

    Copyright © 2025 smartinvestmenttoday.com | All Rights Reserved