No Result
View All Result
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Smart Investment Today
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Smart Investment Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Editor's Pick

Should California Waive Environmental Laws?

by
January 29, 2025
in Editor's Pick
0
Should California Waive Environmental Laws?
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Jeffrey Miron

On January 12, California Governor Gavin Newson signed an executive order waiving permitting requirements for homeowners and businesses affected by the fires in Los Angeles and Ventura counties. The directive suspends sections of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the California Coastal Act, aiming to expedite the rebuilding of as many as 12,000 homes destroyed in the fires.

Even before the fires, the typical home in California was $790,742, 220 percent of the national average. Moreover, the Wall Street Journal points out that California’s onerous building codes and permitting fees contribute to astronomical “affordable” housing costs, where units can cost $1 million to build. The state’s regulatory framework is widely regarded as a significant barrier to development; by requiring environmental reviews and opening the door for lawsuits, CEQA and the Coastal Act delay projects for years, driving up costs and discouraging investment.

Governor Newsom’s executive order waives permits previously justified as necessary for environmental protection and sustainable development. But if these regulations were essential before the fires, why suspend them now? The risks they seek to mitigate, such as soil erosion and waterway contamination, still exist post-fire and may be amplified by rushed rebuilding.

On the other hand, if these regulations were always excessive, then why limit their suspension to fire recovery? In the past, CEQA exemptions have been granted for high-profile projects such as sports stadiums and affordable housing developments. These cases highlight an inconsistency: the state recognizes that CEQA hinders timely and efficient development but has so far resisted broader reform. Why not reform or relax the laws to make them less onerous everywhere, rather than relying on piecemeal exceptions during crises?

Newsom’s executive order exposes a fundamental tension in California’s housing policy. If the regulations are too restrictive for disaster recovery, they are likely too restrictive broadly. And if they truly are necessary, they should remain, even in the face of the fires.

This article appeared on Substack on January 29, 2025. Jonah Karafiol, a student at Harvard College, co-wrote this post.

Previous Post

R.I.P. National Nature Assessment

Next Post

Trump Media turns to cryptocurrency with new truth.fi venture

Next Post
Trump Media turns to cryptocurrency with new truth.fi venture

Trump Media turns to cryptocurrency with new truth.fi venture

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    • Trending
    • Comments
    • Latest

    Gold Prices Rise as the Dollar Slowly Dies

    May 25, 2024

    Richard Murphy, The Bank of England, And MMT Confusion

    March 15, 2025

    We Can’t Fix International Organizations like the WTO. Abolish Them.

    March 15, 2025

    Free Markets Promote Peaceful Cooperation and Racial Harmony

    March 15, 2025
    A Disappointing Supreme Court Decision Weakens Online First Amendment Protections

    A Disappointing Supreme Court Decision Weakens Online First Amendment Protections

    0

    Ana-Maria Coaching Marks Milestone with New Book Release

    0

    The Consequences of California’s New Minimum Wage Law

    0

    Memorial Day

    0
    A Disappointing Supreme Court Decision Weakens Online First Amendment Protections

    A Disappointing Supreme Court Decision Weakens Online First Amendment Protections

    June 27, 2025
    Brazil’s Supreme Court Rewrites the Rules to Censor Online Speech

    Brazil’s Supreme Court Rewrites the Rules to Censor Online Speech

    June 27, 2025
    The Supreme Court Is Right on Reading Opt-Outs, But That’s Not Enough

    The Supreme Court Is Right on Reading Opt-Outs, But That’s Not Enough

    June 27, 2025
    Friday Feature: Savannah Legacy Academy

    Friday Feature: Savannah Legacy Academy

    June 27, 2025

    Recent News

    A Disappointing Supreme Court Decision Weakens Online First Amendment Protections

    A Disappointing Supreme Court Decision Weakens Online First Amendment Protections

    June 27, 2025
    Brazil’s Supreme Court Rewrites the Rules to Censor Online Speech

    Brazil’s Supreme Court Rewrites the Rules to Censor Online Speech

    June 27, 2025
    The Supreme Court Is Right on Reading Opt-Outs, But That’s Not Enough

    The Supreme Court Is Right on Reading Opt-Outs, But That’s Not Enough

    June 27, 2025
    Friday Feature: Savannah Legacy Academy

    Friday Feature: Savannah Legacy Academy

    June 27, 2025
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 smartinvestmenttoday.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • News
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Investing
    • Stock

    Copyright © 2025 smartinvestmenttoday.com | All Rights Reserved