No Result
View All Result
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Smart Investment Today
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Smart Investment Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Investing

Red tape risks turning city into ‘graveyard’, warns Bank of England official

by
October 18, 2024
in Investing
0
Red tape risks turning city into ‘graveyard’, warns Bank of England official
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Excessive regulation could turn the City of London into a “graveyard” by stifling innovation and risk-taking, Sam Woods, chief executive of the Bank of England’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), has warned.

Speaking at the City’s annual banquet at Mansion House, Woods cautioned that while financial regulations are necessary for stability, over-regulation could suffocate the financial sector’s ability to drive economic growth.

Woods described risk as the “lifeblood” of a thriving economy, arguing that attempting to eliminate it altogether would hinder innovation and leave the City stagnant. “Risk is the lifeblood of a thriving capitalist economy, fuelling growth and innovation,” Woods said. “The whole point of having a strong financial system is to enable society to take risks.”

His comments come amid growing concerns that Britain’s efforts to make financial institutions safer are becoming counterproductive. Woods acknowledged that the balance between regulation and risk management is difficult but crucial, noting: “It’s implausible that good businesses can thrive in an environment of ever-expanding regulation.”

Woods pointed to recent moves by the PRA, such as the decision to abolish the cap on bankers’ bonuses, as evidence of regulators taking steps to reduce the burden on the City. The cap had been “damaging to competitiveness,” he said, and scrapping it sent an important signal of intent that unnecessary regulations should be rolled back.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has also faced criticism over its increasing regulatory requirements. In February, the FCA was under fire for proposals to “name and shame” companies under investigation, and it has also faced complaints regarding rules around diversity and inclusion disclosures. Jeremy Hunt, the former chancellor, introduced a new mandate for regulators, including the FCA and PRA, to consider economic growth as a “secondary objective” to their regulatory duties. The move was seen as a direct response to concerns that regulators were holding back the City’s growth potential.

Sir Keir Starmer, who has largely followed the previous government’s regulatory approach, reinforced this direction by urging regulators to take economic growth seriously. Speaking at the International Investment Summit, Starmer said the government would force regulators to focus on growth as a priority.

Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the FCA, echoed Woods’ sentiments, describing the new growth mandate as “liberating” and leading to more open conversations about risk. Rathi and Woods both stressed the importance of striking the right balance between maintaining stability in the financial system and allowing enough flexibility for businesses to grow and take calculated risks.

David Postings, chief executive of UK Finance, the banking lobby group, agreed, saying: “If we can collectively get the balance right between risk and protection for consumers, this will help in supporting economic growth and financial inclusion in the UK.”

As regulators face mounting pressure to relax red tape and promote competitiveness, Woods’ remarks reflect a broader debate about how to balance the need for stability with the need for growth and innovation in the financial sector.

Read more:
Red tape risks turning city into ‘graveyard’, warns Bank of England official

Previous Post

Reeves considers ending salary sacrifice tax breaks for electric vehicles, sparking industry backlash

Next Post

Who Starts Business Cycles? Banks or the Fed?

Next Post

Who Starts Business Cycles? Banks or the Fed?

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    • Trending
    • Comments
    • Latest

    Gold Prices Rise as the Dollar Slowly Dies

    May 25, 2024

    Richard Murphy, The Bank of England, And MMT Confusion

    March 15, 2025

    We Can’t Fix International Organizations like the WTO. Abolish Them.

    March 15, 2025

    Free Markets Promote Peaceful Cooperation and Racial Harmony

    March 15, 2025

    China’s Strengths Are Over-Exaggerated

    0

    Ana-Maria Coaching Marks Milestone with New Book Release

    0

    The Consequences of California’s New Minimum Wage Law

    0

    Memorial Day

    0

    China’s Strengths Are Over-Exaggerated

    June 7, 2025

    Paul Heyne: The Ethicist Who Thought Like an Economist

    June 7, 2025

    Preparing for War

    June 7, 2025
    I Shot the Tariff (But I Swear It Was in Self-Defense)

    I Shot the Tariff (But I Swear It Was in Self-Defense)

    June 6, 2025

    Recent News

    China’s Strengths Are Over-Exaggerated

    June 7, 2025

    Paul Heyne: The Ethicist Who Thought Like an Economist

    June 7, 2025

    Preparing for War

    June 7, 2025
    I Shot the Tariff (But I Swear It Was in Self-Defense)

    I Shot the Tariff (But I Swear It Was in Self-Defense)

    June 6, 2025
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 smartinvestmenttoday.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • News
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Investing
    • Stock

    Copyright © 2025 smartinvestmenttoday.com | All Rights Reserved